<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Consciousness on madeddu.xyz</title><link>https://madeddu.xyz/tags/consciousness/</link><description>Recent content in Consciousness on madeddu.xyz</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.145.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://madeddu.xyz/tags/consciousness/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Consciousness, collapse and tokens</title><link>https://madeddu.xyz/posts/cognitive/consciousness-llm-relational/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://madeddu.xyz/posts/cognitive/consciousness-llm-relational/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="consciousness-cannot-be-an-algorithm">Consciousness cannot be an algorithm&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>In 1989, Roger Penrose — British mathematical physicist, the one who proved black holes are inevitable in general relativity, Nobel Prize 2020 — publishes &lt;em>The Emperor&amp;rsquo;s New Mind&lt;/em>&lt;sup id="fnref:1">&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1&lt;/a>&lt;/sup> and makes a claim that infuriates half the academic world: &lt;strong>human consciousness is not computable&lt;/strong>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The reasoning goes like this. Gödel proved that for any sufficiently powerful formal system, there exist truths the system &lt;em>cannot prove&lt;/em>. If the brain were a computer — a formal system executing algorithms — there would be things we couldn&amp;rsquo;t understand. But we do understand them (mathematical insight, for instance). Ergo: the brain is doing something no algorithm, given any amount of time and memory, can ever do.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>